Kunkel v. Bohuslav
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Chief Justice.
The fundamental issue presented by this appeal is the construction of Rules 376 and 386, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, and a determination of whether appellants’ motion for extension of time in which to file the transcript should be granted.
Final judgment and notice of appeal were entered on December 15, 1972. The record does not disclose that a motion for new trial was ever filed. Appellant, on January 12, 1973, timely deposited cash in lieu of an appeal bond. Subsequently, on February 8, 1973, 55 days after the entry of judgment, appellants filed with the clerk of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Patterson v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1968
- Wigley v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Jahant v. OgdenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Vaughan v. Commercial Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Gutierrez v. CasanovaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Save Our City Organization of San Antonio v. Texas Highway CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Daniels v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Kunkel v. BohuslavCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973