Legal Opinion

Montrallo v. Fritz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 4, 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order, insofar as appealed from, unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied and complaint reinstated. Memorandum: On a motion by defendant Barnes to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a cause of action, the allegations of the complaint are deemed true and plaintiff must be given the benefit of every favorable inference to be drawn therefrom (see, Siegel, NY Prac § 265 [2d ed]). Thus viewed, plaintiff’s complaint adequately sets forth a cause of action for unfair competition against defendant Barnes based upon the alleged misappropriation of plaintiff’s…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beverage Marketing USA, Inc. v. South Beach Beverage Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Rao v. VerdeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Cohen & Lombardo, P.C. v. ConnorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
  4. Frankel v. American Film Technologies, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API