Montrallo v. Fritz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Order, insofar as appealed from, unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied and complaint reinstated. Memorandum: On a motion by defendant Barnes to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a cause of action, the allegations of the complaint are deemed true and plaintiff must be given the benefit of every favorable inference to be drawn therefrom (see, Siegel, NY Prac § 265 [2d ed]). Thus viewed, plaintiff’s complaint adequately sets forth a cause of action for unfair competition against defendant Barnes based upon the alleged misappropriation of plaintiff’s…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Beverage Marketing USA, Inc. v. South Beach Beverage Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Rao v. VerdeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Cohen & Lombardo, P.C. v. ConnorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- Frankel v. American Film Technologies, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1998