Legal Opinion

Haskett v. Auhl

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided June 4, 1896No. 126PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Memorandum. — Error from Marshall distriqt court ; R. B. Spilman, judge. Action iu replevin by C. T. Haskett against F. F. Auhl and T. D. Grimes. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff brings the case to this court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Garver, J. :

The plaintiff, C.T. Haskett, claiming to be the owner of a stock of merchandise, brought this action in the district court of Marshall county to recover a portion thereof which had been attached as the property of one M. J. Thayer by the defendant, as sheriff, in an action pending in said court. Haskett claimed ownership by virtue of a sale and transfer of the goods from M. J. Thayer to him, made October 3, 1892. The validity of said transfer was attacked by the defendant, as having been made in fraud of the creditors of Thayer. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Douglass v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  2. Dodson v. CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  3. Kurtz v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hood v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1899
  2. Winfield National Bank v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API