Mettling v. Mulligan
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Yetka, Justice.
Defendants Louise and Earl DuFresne appeal from an order of the District Court of Chippewa County denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or, alternatively, for a new trial. We affirm.
The incident giving rise to this appeal occurred on April 15, 1972, in a 3.2 beer parlor known as The Tap, which was located in Montevideo, Minnesota. At that time, The Tap was owned and operated by defendants Louise and Earl DuFresne.
The incident occurred at approximately 9 p.m. Plaintiff and defendant Tom Mulligan were patrons of The Tap and had been conversing at the bar…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Trail v. ChristianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Carpenter v. MattisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Klingbeil v. TruesdellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Peck v. GerberOregon Supreme Court · 1936
- Priewe v. BartzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Curtis Gene Hoyt v. Gutterz Bowl & Lounge L.L.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
- Quinn v. Winkel's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Alexander v. 1328 Uptown, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
- Curtis Gene Hoyt v. Gutterz Bowl & Lounge L.L.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.