Legal Opinion

State v. Pittman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1984No. 12897PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FLANIGAN, Presiding Judge.

Defendant was charged with the sale of percodan, a Schedule II controlled substance, in violation of § 195.020,1 and was prosecuted as having been previously convicted of a felony violation of the laws of this state relating to controlled substances. § 195.200.1(5). Defendant pleaded “not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect excluding responsibility.” The jury found defendant guilty and he was sentenced, by the trial court, to a term of 15 years. Defendant appeals.

Defendant’s first point is that the trial court erred in refusing to give Instruction A,2…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BlairSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  2. State v. GraySupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. State v. CollierMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Triplett v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
  5. State v. WeimerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BrittonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API