Carrico v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Appeal from the District Court of Panola. Tried below before Hon. W. J. Graham. Appeal from a conviction for hog theft; penalty, two years’ imprisonment in the penitentiary. The indictment charged appellant, Wine Carrico, and Carl Carrico, and Frank Hail jointly with the theft of six hogs, the property of Albert Soloman.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District Court of Panola. Tried below before Hon. W. J. Graham. Appeal from a conviction for hog theft; penalty, two years’ imprisonment in the penitentiary. The indictment charged appellant, Wine Carrico, and Carl Carrico, and Frank Hail jointly with the theft of six hogs, the property of Albert Soloman. They were jointly tried in this proceeding, and Wine and Carl Carrico were each convicted, with the punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary; and Frank Hail was acquitted. Albert Soloman testified to losing his hogs, and, after some months,, finding them nine…
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of the theft of hogs, and given a term of two years in the penitentiary; hence this appeal. The indictment charged Wine Carrico, Carl Carrico, and Frank Nail with the theft of six hogs, the property of Albert Soloman. On the trial Frank Nail was acquitted, and the other two defendants convicted. The court granted a new trial as to Carl Carrico, and overruled a new trial as to Wine Carrico. Appellant made a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered testimony. The testimony consisted in the evidence of Frank Nail, who, it is alleged, was…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Ryan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.