Sully v. Goldsmith
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Des Moines Disbrict Court. Action on a promissory note. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, Ch. J.
i. ptEADiw»: Sot”:1 deíJai ot execution. This case was before us on appeal by plaintiff from Henry District Court, and decided at the December Term, 1871, reported in 32 Iowa, 397. The action is upon a negotiable promissory note, pXTrporfelng to be executed by the defendant to Corey & Stone, and by them indorsed to the plaintiff. The defendant in his answer denies the making of the note, alleges that it was procured by fraud, and that the plaintiff purchased the same with knowledge of the fraud. On the former appeal it was held that although the note may have been obtained by…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sully v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Hall v. Ætna Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1870
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hicks v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- Ainsworth Savings Bank v. ColthurstSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- Quaas v. QuaasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958