Legal Opinion

Layman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 10, 1988No. F-85-284Published

1Opinion of the Court

*1359OPINION

BRETT, Presiding Judge:

The appellant, James H. Layman, was tried by jury in the McIntosh County District Court, Case No. CRF-84-54 and found guilty of Obtaining Public Welfare Assistance by Means of False Representation in violation of 56 O.S.1981, § 185. The jury sentenced appellant to a two-year suspended sentence and assessed a fine of $2,000.00. The trial judge assessed additional penalties of $1,756.00 in restitution and $258.00 in court costs. In accordance with 22 O.S.1981, § 991d, the appellant was also assessed a total of $240.00 in probation fees. From this judgment and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hale v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. Funkhouser v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987
  4. Armstrong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987
  5. Avey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API