Legal Opinion
Valley Line Co. v. The M/V City of Greenville
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided March 30, 1984No. Nos. 83-808A(1), 83-1149A(1)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM
NANGLE, Chief Judge.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of third-party defendant Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission (mistakenly designated by third-party plaintiffs as “State of Missouri Department of Highways and Transportation”) for summary judgment1 on the third-party complaint of third-party plaintiffs, M/V City of Greenville and Valley Towing Service, Inc., be and is granted and said third-party complaint be and is dismissed. This is an admiralty suit arising out of a collision between one or more barges in the tow of third-party plaintiffs’ vessel and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Ford Motor Co. v. Department of TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Employees of Department of Public Health v. Department of Public HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Poettker Construction Co. v. Highway & Transportation CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1993
- In re Manson Construction Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2012