Legal Opinion

Nevis v. Rideout Memorial Hospital

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 22, 2023No. 2:17-cv-02295Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH DANIEL NEVIS, No. 2:17-cv-02295-DAD-AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT AMTRAK’S MOTION TO COMPEL 14 RIDEOUT MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, et ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SATISFACTION al., OF THE JUDGMENT 15 Defendants. (Doc. No. 368) 16 17 18 The matter is before the court on the motion to compel plaintiff’s acknowledgment of 19 satisfaction of the judgment pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 724.050 filed by 20 defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”). (Doc. No. 368.) On…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hale v. BohannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Conservatorship of McQueenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Gray1 CPB, LLC v. SCC Acquisitions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Long v. Cuttle Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API