Legal Opinion

Robertson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 12, 1993No. 18345PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROW, Presiding Judge.

This appeal is the successor to State v. Robertson, 816 S.W.2d 952 (Mo.App.1991), a consolidated appeal by James N. Robertson (“Movant”) of (a) his conviction of sexual assault in the first degree, and (b) the denial of postconviction relief in a proceeding under Rule 29.15.1 In that opinion, this Court affirmed the conviction, but reversed the order in the 29.15 proceeding and remanded it to the motion court for a finding as to whether Movant’s lawyer made the determinations required by Rule 29.15(e), which reads:

When an indigent movant files a pro se motion, the court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. HamiltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Harry v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. State v. AdamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. State v. RobertsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gilliland v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Phillips v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. State v. MartineauMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. State v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Green v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API