Legal Opinion

Gage v. Rizzo

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 28, 1957No. Civ. A. No. 14172Published

1Opinion of the Court

VAN DUSEN, District Judge.

The trial judge makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law:

Findings of Fact

1. About 1:15 A.M. on July 22, 1951 (a clear, dry night), the plaintiff, Win-ant C. Gage, was operating the 1950 Pontiac sedan owned jointly by himself and his wife in a northerly direction on Route 202 some two or three miles north of Norristown.

2. Passengers in the automobile were the wife of the operator, Charlotte A. Gage, who was seated on the front seat, and his son, William Gage, who was seated in the back seat.

3. Route 202 at and near the scene of the accident was a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Marion F. McDonald v. C. Y. Patton, Sr., Trading and Doing Business as Patton's Gulf ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
  3. Kopka v. Bell Telephone Co. of Pa.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Smith v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Early v. American Dredging Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1951

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API