Legal Opinion
Tompkins Square Neighbors, Inc. v. Zaragoza
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided February 28, 1973PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
Landlord, a redevelopment company, refused to renew tenants ’ lease.
The judgment appealed from, insofar as predicated upon the finding that, as a matter of constitutionality required due proc*127ess, a hearing was necessary before landlord appellant could determine not to renew tenant’s lease and require tenant’s removal, is in accord with the weight of recent authority, in view of the substantial and continued government involvement in landlord’s operations to which, in effect, “ the coloration of state action fairly attaches.” (McQueen v. Drucker, 438 F. 2d 781, 784-785 [1st Cir.]; see, also,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- William McQueen v. Bertram DrukerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
- Colon v. Tompkins Square Neighbors, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- New York City Housing Authority v. GanttCivil Court of the City of New York · 1967
- Bonner v. Park Lake Housing Development Fund Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1972
- 117 & 127 West 48th Street Corp. v. GouldAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1957
3Cited by3 opinions
- 1021-27 Avenue St. John Housing Development Fund Corp. v. HernandezCivil Court of the City of New York · 1992
- Tompkins Square Neighbors, Inc. v. ZaragozaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Lo Cascio v. BaileyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1973