Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Waters

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1936No. Nos. 23224, 23225, 23226. Judgments affirmedPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Herrick

In the municipal court of Chicago separate proceedings were instituted by the city of Chicago against Isaac Waters, Marcus Hauge and Frank Gorman for the violation of section 2947 of the revised code of Chicago of 1931. The cases were separately tried on the same day without a jury, each defendant was found guilty and judgment was entered against him. In each case the trial judge certified that the validity of a municipal ordinance was involved and in his opinion the public interest required a direct appeal to this court. Each defendant perfected his appeal and the three cases were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gartside v. City of East St. LouisIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  2. People ex rel. Lockwood & Strickland Co. v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Ferguson Coal Co. v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  4. City of Chicago v. KautzIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  5. City of Chicago v. Wisconsin Lime & Cement Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Dawdy, Jr. v. Union Pacific R.R. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Chicago Park District v. Kenroy, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Poole v. City of KankakeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Schuringa v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Dean Milk Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1944

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API