Legal Opinion

Weintraub v. Kahn

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1957PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtIrving H. Saypol, J.

Defendants move, pursuant to rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for dismissal of the complaint, upon the ground that plaintiff has not legal capacity to sue.

In a first cause of action plaintiff sues upon a claimed violation of the Bulk Sales Act (Personal Property Law, § 44). The allegation that the sale was consummated must be deemed to be true. Some time thereafter the seller made an assignment for the benefit of creditors. Defendants contend that the cause of action belongs to the assignee (Debtor and Creditor Law, § 15, subd. 6, as amd. by L. 1950, ch. 758, eff. Sept. 1, 1950).…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. American Mercantile Co. v. WohlmuthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Langer v. Joed Stores Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API