Voll v. Randazzo
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Judge.
George P. Voll (Voll) and Bridget Voll appeal a final judgment in favor of Charles Randazzo (Randazzo) and Mary Randazzo in their action against the Volls. Because we find there was competent substantial evidence that Voll breached his fiduciary duty to the Randazzos, and that he and Bridget Voll conspired to perpetrate a fraud on the Randazzos, we affirm the final judgment, except that we strike the portion of paragraph one of the judgment imposing liability against Bridget Voll as to count one.
The Randazzos filed a three count complaint against the Volls, Florida…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Colvin v. McDougallCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- Menendez v. Beech Acceptance Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- De Ribeaux v. Del ValleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Daniel v. Coastal Bonded Title Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Dozier & Gay Paint Co., Inc. v. DilleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Salkin v. Chira (In Re Chira)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2006