Legal Opinion

Hartford Life Ins. Co. v. EINHORN EX REL. MEHRING

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided December 30, 2009No. CV 04-2738(ADS)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SPATT, District Judge.

This case pits a surviving niece of the decedent against her brother and sister in a dispute over the proceeds of a life insurance policy. The key issue presented is whether a signed but undated Change of Beneficiary form constituted “substantial compliance” with the requirements for changing the beneficiaries of the policy.

This case began as a federal interpleader action, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1335, in which the plaintiff Hartford Life Insurance Company (“Hartford”) sought to deposit with the Court the proceeds of a group life insurance policy (“the Policy”)…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Becker v. MontgomerySupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Boggs v. BoggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance Company v. William Jackson Adams, Iv, Rosita L. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  5. Krishna v. Colgate Palmolive Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n of America v. BernardoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API