Moore v. Moore
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On final hearing on bill, answer, replication and proofs taken in open court.
1Opinion of the Court
Stevenson, V. C.
1. There is some difficulty in defining the meaning and force of the antenuptial agreement made when the parties were both domiciled in the Province of Quebec, owing to the meagre disclosure which the proofs make of the circumstances and conditions which attended the transaction. Mr. Moore is described in the agreement as the “Quebec Manager of the Quebec Steamship Company” Mrs. Moore, then Miss Kaylor, is described as “of the Town of Iberville, in the County of Iberville, in the said Province,” but she is further described as “the daughter of Daniel Kaylor,. now of Tennessee,…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Federal Trust Co. v. OstNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
- Gibson v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Brooklyn Trust Co. v. DaisNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
- Caravatta v. O'BrienNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
- Brown v. RobbinsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.