Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Gamarino

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 30, 1982No. 1625PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The Commonwealth has appealed from an order of the Court of Common Pleas following a trial de novo of a summary offense. Because the order is improper, we cannot reach the merits of the Commonwealth’s contentions. Accordingly, we must vacate the order and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

The order appealed states, inter alia, that “the appeal on the merits is sustained, the charge is dismissed, and [appellee is] discharged.” “As we have held repeatedly, on an appeal from the judgment ... in summary conviction proceedings, the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas should be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KochSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. CarterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Commonwealth v. AltonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Commonwealth v. YoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GulaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. KyleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. KrutSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. CunninghamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Commonwealth v. BecraftCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API