Legal Opinion

Lindh v. Surman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1997No. 524PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FORD ELLIOTT, Judge.

This appeal requires resolution of the novel question whether the law of Pennsylvania should permit retention of an engagement ring or its value by the donee, after the donor of the ring breaks their engagement. The facts follow.

Appellee Rodger Lindh (Rodger) asked appellant Janis Surman (Janis) to marry him on August 24,1993. Janis accepted his proposal and Rodger gave Janis a diamond engage-mént ring worth approximately $21,000. Unfortunately, Rodger experienced misgivings about the impending marriage and requested the ring’s return in October of 1993. Janis returned the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pavlicic v. VogtsbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Stanger v. EplerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Ruehling v. HornungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Semenza v. AlfanoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Ferraro v. SinghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. JohnstonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. McGoldrick, J. v. Murphy, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. LaVigne v. Wise, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County1999
  4. McGoldrick, J. v. Murphy, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API