Lindh v. Surman
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
FORD ELLIOTT, Judge.
This appeal requires resolution of the novel question whether the law of Pennsylvania should permit retention of an engagement ring or its value by the donee, after the donor of the ring breaks their engagement. The facts follow.
Appellee Rodger Lindh (Rodger) asked appellant Janis Surman (Janis) to marry him on August 24,1993. Janis accepted his proposal and Rodger gave Janis a diamond engage-mént ring worth approximately $21,000. Unfortunately, Rodger experienced misgivings about the impending marriage and requested the ring’s return in October of 1993. Janis returned the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pavlicic v. VogtsbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Stanger v. EplerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Ruehling v. HornungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Semenza v. AlfanoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Ferraro v. SinghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nicholson v. JohnstonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- McGoldrick, J. v. Murphy, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- LaVigne v. Wise, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County1999
- McGoldrick, J. v. Murphy, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020