Legal Opinion
Planned Parenthood v. Kristin mayes/hazelrigg
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided April 9, 2024No. CV-23-0005-PRPublished
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA PLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA, INC., SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PLANNED PARENTHOOD CENTER OF TUCSON, INC.; LAURA CONOVER, PIMA COUNTY ATTORNEY, Appellants, v. KRISTIN K. MAYES, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, and ERIC HAZELRIGG, M.D., AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM OF UNBORN CHILD OF PLAINTIFF JANE ROE AND ALL OTHER UNBORN INFANTS SIMILARLY SITUATED; DENNIS MCGRANE, YAVAPAI COUNTY ATTORNEY, Intervenors. No. CV-23-0005-PR Filed April 9, 2024 Appeal from the Superior Court in Pima County The Honorable Kellie L. Johnson, Judge No. C127867…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Colautti v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.