Moore, Marsh & Co. v. Neill
Supreme Court of Georgia
Attachments. Fraud. Debtor and creditor. Before Judge Boney. ' Burke superior court. December term, 1889. In these cases and those of Gray and Coleman, following, the petitions were for attachments under the code, §3297 et seq., and upon them the judge issued attachments which were levied upon goods to which claims were interposed by Neill.
Read the full summary
Attachments. Fraud. Debtor and creditor. Before Judge Boney. ' Burke superior court. December term, 1889. In these cases and those of Gray and Coleman, following, the petitions were for attachments under the code, §3297 et seq., and upon them the judge issued attachments which were levied upon goods to which claims were interposed by Neill. The petitions of Gray and of Coleman were presented to the judge on December 11, 1888; that of Waxelbaum, on January 9, 1889; and that of Moore, on Jauuary 25, 1889. The affidavit of Blackwell, supporting the petitions of Gray and Coleman, is recited in…
1Opinion of the Court
Bleckley, Chief Justice.
1. The affidavits supporting the petition for attachment in each of these cases were substantially the same, in all essential particulars, as those which were ruled insufficient in Meinhard v. Neill, 85 Ga. 265, 11 S. E. Rep. 613. That case being directly in point, is a controlling, and to us a satisfactory authority in the present cases.
2. The only remaining question is, whether the court erred in denying the application made by the plaintiffs in attachment to amend their petitions for attachment, by appending to the same certified copies of certain documents…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Meinhard Bros. & Co. v. NeillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
3Cited by5 opinions
- Levin v. American Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Worley Bros. Granite Co. v. HaskinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Roberts v. McCollumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Higgins v. GosdenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Mahan v. ParksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952