United States v. Annis
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Despite his pleas to the contrary, the appellant was convicted by general court-martial in Korea of stealing approximately $5,800.00 worth of government property (steak and pot roast) in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice (10 U.S.C. § 921). The approved sentence is reflected above.
The principle error which has been framed by counsel is whether the appellant was prejudiced by the transfer of the trial defense counsel prior to completion of the post-trial review. We find no error and affirm.
The facts are not in dispute. The appellant was represented…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. MyhrbergU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1976
- United States v. HawkinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. MillerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976
- United States v. BatesU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. AlbrechtU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1977