Legal Opinion
Smrekar v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 19, 1939No. Appeal, 68PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Cunningham, J.,
By this appeal and the following one at No. 79 April Term, 1939, by the same appellant from a judgment of the Common Pleas of Beaver County, we are required to decide whether, under Section 307 of our Workmen’s Compensation Act of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736, as further amended by the Act of April 26, 1929, P. L. 829, 77 PS §§561-2, the compensation for which Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. is admittedly liable, by reason of the death of Victor DePelice from an acci dent suffered in the course of his employment with it, is payable to his illegitimate infant daughter, Marline…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re the Estate of MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Perkins v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Morris v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Overseers of the Poor of Forest City v. Overseers of the Poor of DamascusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Balanti v. Stineman Coal & Coke Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Cairgle v. AMERICAN R. AND SS CORP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Cairgle v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Commonwealth v. DepofiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Commonwealth v. BaroneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Anderson v. Greenville BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.