Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co v. Anderson Tool Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom Madison Cirenit Court; Charles K. Bagot, Judge. Action by The Anderson Tool Company against The Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1405 Burns 1908, Acts 1901 p. 590.)
1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.
Action by appellee against appellant to replevy nine gas engines, some engine parts, and pump jacks. ’ The complaint was in one paragraph, against appellant and the Chicago and Alton Railroad Company. The latter filed a plea in abatement, under which it went out of court. Appellant unsuccessfully demurred to the complaint, and answered in general denial, and by a special answer; to the latter a demurrer was sustained, and the cause went to trial on the complaint and general denial. The only error assigned and not waived is in overruling the motion for a new trial. The verified complaint…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Platter v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Vinton v. BaldwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Collender v. . DinsmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Stiles v. Davis & BartonSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
- United States Express Co. v. KeeferIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tucker v. Capital City RiggersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Schulz v. GrahamIndiana Supreme Court · 1955
- Cadick Milling Co. v. Valdosta Grocery Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1920
- Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Distributing Corp. v. CockeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Doering v. SchneiderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.