Charter One Bank v. Tutin, Unpublished Decision (3-23-2006)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
JOURNAL ENTRY and OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendants Sandra Tutin, Edie Buchanan and David Corrado appeal from a summary judgment in favor of plaintiff Charter One Bank in a foreclosure matter. We are constrained to find that we lack a final, appealable order because there are outstanding claims under Civ.R. 54(B) and the court did not personally specify that there was no just reason for delay. We dismiss this appeal.
{¶ 2} The court referred Charter One's motion for summary judgment to a magistrate for consideration. The magistrate decided that summary judgment should issue to Charter One on its…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United Companies Lending Corp. v. RobinsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
3Cited by2 opinions
- Faraj v. QasemOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Sanctuary Condominium Assn., Inc. v. CastroOhio Court of Appeals · 2018