Legal Opinion

Charter One Bank v. Tutin, Unpublished Decision (3-23-2006)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 23, 2006No. 86556UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOURNAL ENTRY and OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendants Sandra Tutin, Edie Buchanan and David Corrado appeal from a summary judgment in favor of plaintiff Charter One Bank in a foreclosure matter. We are constrained to find that we lack a final, appealable order because there are outstanding claims under Civ.R. 54(B) and the court did not personally specify that there was no just reason for delay. We dismiss this appeal.

{¶ 2} The court referred Charter One's motion for summary judgment to a magistrate for consideration. The magistrate decided that summary judgment should issue to Charter One on its…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United Companies Lending Corp. v. RobinsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Faraj v. QasemOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Sanctuary Condominium Assn., Inc. v. CastroOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API