Legal Opinion

Howard v. Sikula

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided January 23, 1986No. C-3-84-986PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND; DECISION AND ENTRY ORDERING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT NANCY A. GUEST SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED; DECISION AND ENTRY CONSTRUING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND SUSTAINING SAME

RICE, District Judge.

This case is presently before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand (Doc. # 3) and on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 12). For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand is overruled, and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Willingham v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. L. Patrick Gray, III v. Griffin BellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  5. James B. Stanley v. Central Intelligence Agency United States Department of Defense U.S. ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Russo v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Deckinger v. Castro-ReyesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1988
  3. Tate v. Jane DoeDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API