Howard v. Sikula
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND; DECISION AND ENTRY ORDERING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT NANCY A. GUEST SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED; DECISION AND ENTRY CONSTRUING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND SUSTAINING SAME
RICE, District Judge.
This case is presently before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand (Doc. # 3) and on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 12). For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand is overruled, and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Willingham v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- L. Patrick Gray, III v. Griffin BellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- James B. Stanley v. Central Intelligence Agency United States Department of Defense U.S. ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Russo v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
- Deckinger v. Castro-ReyesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1988
- Tate v. Jane DoeDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2024