Legal Opinion

Olms v. Bingham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 11, 1907PublishedCited by 3 opinions

■ Appeal by' the plaintiff, Louis W. Olms, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of.Kings on the 24th day of September, 1906, denying the plaintiff’s motion to continue a temporary injunction pendente lite and vacating the said injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

Gaynor, J.:

The complaint and moving affidavits state that the plaintiff is a licensed hotelkeeper at the seaside place within the- city limits called'Arverne; that the hotel has 39 bedrooms, and has a music casino; that every day for two weeks three police officers came to his place in the evening under direction of the captain of the precinct, and demanded that he conduct them through the hotel for inspection; that they would go through the entire premises, occupying one-half an hour; that they also came often after midnight and demanded that the plaintiff open all of the bedrooms to them,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hagan v. McAdooAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kent v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
  2. Mehler v. BakerNew York Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Olms v. BinghamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API