Legal Opinion

Virkler v. Shockney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 26, 1991PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order and judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: We conclude that the jury’s award of damages did not "deviat[e] materially from what would be reasonable compensation” (CPLR 5501 [c]) for the severe injuries and disability sustained by plaintiff. The trial court did not err by failing to hold a collateral source hearing with respect to the award for loss of earnings (see, CPLR 4545 [c]). Following announcement of the verdict, the court set a date for motions addressed to the verdict. Defense counsel indicated the need for a collateral source hearing. The court suggested that…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Firmes v. Chase Manhattan Automotive Finance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Johnston v. JoyceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Jenkins v. Meredith Avenue AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Wooten v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Damiano v. Exide Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API