Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Schill v. Wisconsin Rapids School District

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 2010No. 2008AP967-ACPublished

1ConcurrenceAnn Walsh Bradley, J.

¶ 144. (concurring). During the last several decades, technological advancements have revolutionized document storage and electronic communication. Prior to these advancements, an employee's personal communications, whether by note, letter, or telephone call, would not have been kept by an authority and therefore would not have been subject to disclosure under the public records law.

*634¶ 145. As a result of changing technology, however, many personal communications that are unrelated to the affairs of government and the official acts of officers and employees may now be "kept by an authority"…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Journal/Sentinel, Inc. v. School Board of the School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  2. Stone v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin SystemCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API