Legal Opinion

People v. Lofton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 30, 1994PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that Supreme Court improperly allowed the People to bolster the testimony of the complainant by admitting the testimony of a third person on the complainant’s "prompt complaint” of rape. The court did not err in allowing that testimony to establish prompt complaint. It did not constitute bolstering (see, People v McDaniel, 81 NY2d 10, 14, 17-18; cf., People v Taylor, 142 AD2d 410, 421, affd 75 NY2d 277). Even if the testimony constituted bolstering, its admission was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. McDanielNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. People v. MarksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. People v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API