People v. Lofton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that Supreme Court improperly allowed the People to bolster the testimony of the complainant by admitting the testimony of a third person on the complainant’s "prompt complaint” of rape. The court did not err in allowing that testimony to establish prompt complaint. It did not constitute bolstering (see, People v McDaniel, 81 NY2d 10, 14, 17-18; cf., People v Taylor, 142 AD2d 410, 421, affd 75 NY2d 277). Even if the testimony constituted bolstering, its admission was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. McDanielNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. MarksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995