Legal Opinion

Pacificorp, a Maine Corporation, Dba Pacific Power & Light Company v. Bonneville Power Administration

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 4, 1988No. 87-7266PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODWIN, Chief Judge:

Pacificorp is an investor-owned electric utility company serving retail customers in Alturas, California, a city having a population of about 3000. Pacificorp appeals the decision of the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) to serve Alturas with firm power through a creative use of the city’s power of eminent domain and the preference afforded the Surprise Valley Electrification Corporation (SVEC) as a rural electrification beneficiary. See Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act (Planning Act), 16 U.S.C. § 839 et seq. (1982).

SVEC is an electrical…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Aluminum Co. of America v. Central Lincoln Peoples' Utility DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. National Basketball Ass'n v. SDC Basketball Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. California Energy Resources Conservation And Development Commission v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Joe B. RITCHEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UPJOHN DRUG COMPANY; William Dement, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. Clair S. Huffman v. Commissioner Of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Zogbi v. Federated Department StoreDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1991
  4. State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  5. Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API