Legal Opinion

People v. Laborwits

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 21, 1925No. Docket No. 1221PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

The indictment against appellant contained six counts, each charging him with the crime of forgery. Appellant plead guilty to the charge contained in count one, and the other five counts were ordered off the calendar. Thereupon, and before judgment, appellant asked leave to file an application for probation, which was denied by the court.

The only point made by appellant on this appeal is that there was an abuse of the trial court’s discretion in refus ing to allow the defendant the privilege of filing an application for probation. A similar question was before the appellate court in the case…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. DunlopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. People v. PayneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. People v. JudsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. People v. KirwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. In Re NachnaberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API