Legal Opinion
Succession of Robinson v. Harlan
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 9, 2011No. 2011 CA 0703PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, C.J.
|2The parties seek review of the trial court’s October 25, 2010, judgment imposing sanctions against third-party defendants, Terri Marie Robinson, Braden Paul Robinson, and Julie Robinson Davis (the Robinsons), and in favor of third-party plaintiffs Suzanne D. and Charles G. Harlan (the Harlans). The trial court designated the judgment as final and immediately appealable pursuant to Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Annotated article 1915.
The trial court’s judgment imposing sanctions on a party does not determine the substantive merits of the case, but only a preliminary matter in the course…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Holmes v. HendricksLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
- Borden-Aicklen Auto Supply Co. v. Folse Service StationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- Palmetto Oil Co. v. Bethany Oil & Gas Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- Boudreaux v. STATE, DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
- Peak Performance Physical Therapy & Fitness, LLC v. Hibernia Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Succession of LeBouefLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Sullivan v. Malta ParkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017