State Board of Medical Examiners v. Baker
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam.
This writ of certiorari seeks a review of a judgment of the District Court of the city of Elizabeth, adjudging the defendant not guilty of a violation of the act regulating the practice of chiropody.
The defendant is not licensed as a chiropodist. The testimony of the several witnesses for the state board was that he examined their feet by feeling “around those bones in the feet;” took impressions of their feet; and, in each instance, recommended arch supports, and made such supports for them. The charge was $15 in each case. The defendant testified in substance as did the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Flammer v. MorelliSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1924
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Board of Medical Examiners v. PlagerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937