Legal Opinion

State Board of Medical Examiners v. Baker

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 16, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

This writ of certiorari seeks a review of a judgment of the District Court of the city of Elizabeth, adjudging the defendant not guilty of a violation of the act regulating the practice of chiropody.

The defendant is not licensed as a chiropodist. The testimony of the several witnesses for the state board was that he examined their feet by feeling “around those bones in the feet;” took impressions of their feet; and, in each instance, recommended arch supports, and made such supports for them. The charge was $15 in each case. The defendant testified in substance as did the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Flammer v. MorelliSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Board of Medical Examiners v. PlagerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API