Legal Opinion

Marriage of Novick v. Novick

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 16, 1985No. C3-84-1216PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Wife appeals from the amended dissolution decree, contending the trial court erred in disposing of assets, in allocating indebtedness, and in awarding insufficient child support and spousal maintenance. Husband seeks review of the property valuation and the award of attorney’s fees to wife. We affirm.

FACTS

Karen and Michael Novick were married in August 1962. A judgment and decree of dissolution was entered April 11, 1984.

The parties have three children, whose ages were 19, 16, and 13 at the time of trial. Sixteen-year old Wendy is mentally retarded. She attends St. Louis…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bogen v. BogenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. In Re the Marriage of DuBois v. DuBoisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Hadrava v. HadravaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Rogers v. RogersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Krick v. KrickCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Marriage of Rosenberg v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Marriage of Brockman v. BrockmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. LaValle v. LaValleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Marriage of Peterson v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Marriage of Doherty v. DohertyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API