Legal Opinion

Marion v. Saul

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided January 28, 2020No. 4:18-cv-02114Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION ANDREA MARION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 4:18CV2114 HEA ) ANDREW M. SAUL,1 ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court for judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying the application of Plaintiff for supplemental security income benefits under Title XVI of the Act,

42 U.S.C. §§ 1381-1385. For the reasons set forth below, the final decision of the Commissioner is affirmed. Background Plaintiff originally…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Lorraine POLASKI, Et Al., Appellees, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  2. McCoy v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  3. Cox v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  4. Mark S. Guilliams v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  5. Moore v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API