Legal Opinion

Asbury Park & Ocean Grove Bank v. Simensky

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrower, J.

This is an action against an indorser of three promissory notes payable to plaintiff’s predecessor in interest. Defendant denies that he ever received notices of presentment for payment and dishonor. Together with his answer, he served upon plaintiff’s attorneys an affidavit indicating an intention on his part to dispute the fact of due notice. Plaintiff moves to strike out the answer and for summary judgment in its favor.

The notes in suit were payable in New Jersey, and the law of New Jersey with reference to proof on the question of the giving of due notice of dishonor is applicable. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Trusts & Guarantee Co. v. BarnhardtNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Woodmere Academy v. MoskowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  3. Edelman v. National Bank & Trust Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. La Nationale v. LavanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1956
  2. United States v. Gotham Pharmacal Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API