Murdoff v. Murdoff
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MESCHKE, Justice.
Caren Murdoff appeals from an order vacating her default garnishment judgment against Anda Construction. We affirm.
Caren served a garnishment summons and disclosure on a bookkeeper for Anda to collect a divorce judgment against Caren’s ex-husband, Tommy Murdoff, for $6,469. Caren believed Anda owed Tommy over $18,000 for installing an elevator. The bookkeeper did not complete and return the disclosure as directed in NDCC 32-09.1-09, 1 because she was told by a superior that Anda did not owe Tommy any money. At Caren’s request, the trial court entered a default judgment…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- First National Bank of Crosby v. BjorgenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. KnudsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Cuna Mortgage v. AafedtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Overboe v. OdegaardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- LYON DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. Ricke's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. $33,000.00 United States CurrencyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Traynor v. LeclercNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Olson Family Limited Partnership v. Velva ParksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
- Coffman v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Dethloff v. DethloffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.