Legal Opinion

Murdoff v. Murdoff

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1994No. Civ. 930397PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MESCHKE, Justice.

Caren Murdoff appeals from an order vacating her default garnishment judgment against Anda Construction. We affirm.

Caren served a garnishment summons and disclosure on a bookkeeper for Anda to collect a divorce judgment against Caren’s ex-husband, Tommy Murdoff, for $6,469. Caren believed Anda owed Tommy over $18,000 for installing an elevator. The bookkeeper did not complete and return the disclosure as directed in NDCC 32-09.1-09, 1 because she was told by a superior that Anda did not owe Tommy any money. At Caren’s request, the trial court entered a default judgment…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Crosby v. BjorgenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. KnudsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Cuna Mortgage v. AafedtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Overboe v. OdegaardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. LYON DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. Ricke's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. $33,000.00 United States CurrencyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Traynor v. LeclercNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Olson Family Limited Partnership v. Velva ParksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Coffman v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Dethloff v. DethloffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API