Legal Opinion

Florida Board of Bar Examiners re Barnett

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 14, 2007No. SC06-1958Published

1Dissent · LewisLewis, C.J.

Because I do not believe that Barnett’s rehabilitation evidence sufficiently outweighs his past misconduct to support his unconditional admission and because I believe the conditional admission process should be reserved for first-time applicants, I must, respectfully, dissent.

Former members of The Florida Bar or of the bars of other states who have been disbarred or who have resigned in lieu of disciplinary proceedings should not be viewed in the same light in the admissions process as first-time applicants. I am of the view that the availability of conditional admission should be restricted…

Also in this document: Dissent · Bell.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Florida Board of Bar Examiners re R.D.I.Supreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. Florida Board of Bar Examiners re J.J.T.Supreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. Florida Board of Bar Examiners re M.L.B.Supreme Court of Florida · 2000
  4. Florida Board of Bar Examiners re J.A.S.Supreme Court of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API