Legal Opinion

Oliver v. Califano

District Court, D. Utah

Decided April 12, 1979No. Civ. C-75-528PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW and ORDER

JENKINS, District Judge.

Plaintiff Oliver seeks judicial review of the final decision of the defendant Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare (hereinafter referred to as the Secretary) denying Oliver’s claim for black lung disability benefits under the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969, 30 U.S.C. § 901, et seq. Jurisdiction and the standard for review of this action are found in 30 U.S.C. § 923(b), incorporating the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). As to questions of fact, the Secretary’s decision must be affirmed if supported…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Talley v. MathewsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
  2. Joe Paluso and Nick S. Kalekas v. F. David Mathews, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  3. Lawrence J. Keating v. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  4. Nina L. Valentine v. Elliott L. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  5. Jack D. Hanna v. Joseph Califano, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bohn v. HarrisDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1980
  2. Consub Delaware, LLC v. Schahin Engenharia LimitadaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  3. Snoqualmie Indian Tribe v. State of WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API