Floyd v. Piedmont Hospital, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, Judge.
Appellants Doris P. Floyd and Daniel E. Floyd brought, voluntarily dismissed, and then renewed this action against appellee Piedmont Hospital, Inc. (“Piedmont”) and Dr. Michael Goodman for medical negligence and loss of consortium. In the original action, Piedmont timely challenged the sufficiency of service in its answer. Piedmont filed a motion for summary judgment in the renewed action, asserting that the complaint against it was barred under the applicable two-year statute of limitation for medical malpractice actions. OCGA §§ 9-3-34; 9-3-71. See Perry v. Atlanta Hosp. &c.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Terrell v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Scott v. Atlanta Dairies CooperativeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Whatley's Interiors, Inc. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Warshaw Properties v. LackeyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Deloach v. HewesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ludi v. Van MetreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- G. J. Soracco, M.D., P.C. v. DomineckCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998