Legal Opinion

Maldonado v. 69-70 Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 8, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying plaintiffs’ motion to compel disclosure of defendant’s records relating to prior criminal activity at the apartment buildings owned and operated by defendant in Jackson Heights (see, CPLR 3101 [a]; Jacqueline S. v City of New York, 81 NY2d 288, 294, rearg denied 82 NY2d 749). A landlord has a duty to maintain minimal security measures in the face of foreseeable criminal intrusion upon tenants (Miller v State of New York, 62 NY2d 506, 513) and to make the public areas of its property reasonably safe for those who might enter (Nallan v Helmsley-Spear,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nallan v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Miller v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Jacqueline S. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Woods v. AlexanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. McEnaney v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Woods v. AlexanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API