Legal Opinion

Milburn v. Emanuele

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 13, 2012No. 2012-CA-0235PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAX N. TOBIAS, JR., Judge.

hln this appeal, the appellant, Benjamin Milburn (“Milburn”), seeks review of the trial court judgment granting the appel-lee’s exceptions of prematurity and no cause of action. Specifically, Milburn argued that the trial court erred in finding that a valid mediation agreement exists between the parties, resulting in the improper granting of the exception of prematurity. Additionally, he contended that the trial court erred in finding that Charles Emanuele (“Emanuele”) is not a proper party in the proceedings, thus resulting in the improper granting of the exception…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  2. Denoux v. Vessel Management Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  3. Cole v. MurrayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. 831 Bartholomew Investments-A, L.L.C. v. MargulisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Jefferson Door Co. v. Cragmar Construction, L.L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Zeigler v. Housing Authority of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Burgess v. ZhengLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  3. Winstead v. KenyonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Benjamin Pri-Tal and Mary Gaston v. Progressive Property Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2025
  5. Couvillion Group, L.L.C. v. Plaquemines Parish GovernmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API