Legal Opinion

State v. Dillwood

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1968No. 36817PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

In prosecution of defendant for burglary of a fur store, furs taken from defendant’s Ford automobile were admitted into evidence. A jury found him guilty, and he has appealed. He contends that no probable cause existed for the warrantless search and that the search was incident to an illegal arrest. For those reasons, he says, the district court should have suppressed the furs from evidence.

Aulabaugh Fur Store, 2951 Farnam Street, Omaha. Nebraska, was located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Farnam Street with Park Avenue. Employees of the store placed three furs in a front…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State v. HardingNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. ShepardsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  5. State v. CollinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API