Legal Opinion

Matter of East 91st St. Crane Collapse Litig.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 3, 2014No. 117294/08 12927 117469/10 771000/10 12926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Manuel J. Mendez, J.), entered June 12, 2013, which denied defendant Howard I. Shapiro & Associates Consulting Engineers, EC.’s (Engineers) motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaints and all cross claims against it, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Engineers, a professional engineering firm, established its entitlement to summary dismissal of the claims alleging that it negligently inspected the crane and should have noticed that the turntable mechanism…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carter v. Vollmer AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Macias v. City of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matter of McGee v. Putnam County Assistant Dist. Attorney David M. BishopAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  2. Hornsby v. Cathedral Parkway Apts. Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API