Legal Opinion

Clark v. Goodridge

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1906PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action for the construction of a will. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtLevektkitt, J.

This is an action for the construction of a will. The instrument is long and complicated. A many-sided attack is made on most of its. essential provisions and there is some plausibility to each ground of attack. At the same time the underlying scheme of the will is so clear, the distribution of bounty so equitable and the intent in the main so readily deducible that the effort of the court should be to sustain the will, unless fixed rules of law demand its nullification as a testamentary disposition.

The primary, purpose of the testatrix was to provide equally for her four children and their…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re Proving the Will of MountNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Warner v. . DurantNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Clark v. . CammannNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Roe v. . VingutNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Morris v. . SicklyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re Estate of BrundageNew York Surrogate's Court · 1917
  2. Curjel v. AshSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  3. In re the Estate of TimsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1909
  4. In re the Will of O'LoughlinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1946
  5. In re the Construction of the Will of FuschinoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API