Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. McCravy

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 20, 2010No. SC09-490Published

1Opinion of the Court

37 So.3d 240 (2010)

Roman RAMIREZ, Petitioner,

v.

Charles H. McCRAVY, Respondent.

No. SC09-490.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 20, 2010.

Marlene S. Reiss, P.A., Miami, Florida, for Petitioner.

Neil Rose and Jonathan G. Liss of Bernstein, Chackman, Liss and Rose, Hollywood, Florida, for Respondent.

2Per curiam

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal in Ramirez v. McCravy, 4 So.3d 692 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009), based on express and direct conflict with Hankey v. Yarian, 755 So.2d 93 (Fla.2000), and Sullivan v. State, 913 So.2d 762 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). After further…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hearndon v. GrahamSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Hankey v. YarianSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. Sullivan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  4. Ramirez v. McCravyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  5. Ramirez v. McCravySupreme Court of Florida · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API