Legal Opinion

Cavanagh v. Morrow

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1884PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Vorst, J.

The plaintiffs are judgment creditors of the defendant George T. Morrow, and as such bring this action to set aside as fraudulent a. voluntary assignment of all his .property, made by their debtor George T. Morrow to the defendant Thomas J. Morrow, for the benefit of his creditors. The assignment bears date the 25th day of May, 1880, and it contains preferences. The debtor’s estate consisted chiefly of a shoe factory and its contents of manufactured and unmanufactured merchandise, although he owned other property, real and personal, which passed under the assignment.

The assignee took…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Olson v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  2. Thompson v. FryNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Turney v. Van GelderNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Ogden Paint, Oil & Glass Co. v. ChildUtah Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Wilson Bros. Wooden Ware & Toy Co. v. DaggettCity of New York Municipal Court · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API