Legal Opinion

State v. Sanders

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 13, 1986No. 85-2149PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LETTS, Judge.

The sentencing judge departed downward from the guidelines because the defendant had no prior arrests or record1 and because the judge believed the instant defendant should receive the same sentence as had been meted out earlier to a code-fendant, after a plea bargain. Both defendants had participated in the same purse-snatching incident. We reverse.

We are of the opinion that the lack of prior criminal convictions should be a sufficient reason to “take it easy” on a defendant, but are equally sure that it cannot be done under the sentencing guidelines, which, by implication, have…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Albritton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. State v. MischlerSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  3. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  4. Von Carter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Santiago v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SachsSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  2. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API